Sparring over No. 1 Seeds is Madness

March 9, 2009
Blake Griffin isn't alone in thinking his team is The 1

Blake Griffin isn't alone in thinking his team is The 1

The madness has already begun. Unfortunately. Specifically, the insipid debate over which teams will secure No. 1 seeds for the 2009 NCAA tournament.

My umbrage is not over who gets the seeds. Not at all. After a season in which the overall top ranking was treated like a potato just out of the microwave, five teams, maybe six, can lay claim to being one of the top four teams in the nation and deserving of a No. 1 seed: Pittsburgh, North Carolina, Connecticut, Oklahoma and Memphis. Even Louisville, having beaten Pitt in their only meeting, can make a why-not-us? claim (though the Pitt win should be trumped by last month’s loss to underachieving Notre Dame, which probably won’t qualify for the 65-team field)

No, I’m annoyed because the debate over who gets the top seeds is the most nonsensical debate in sports. In truth, it’s irrelevant whether a team gets and No. 1, 2 or 3 seed.

It’s irrelevant because it doesn’t give the top seeds much more than the right to say they’re a No. 1 seed (”It’s a badge of honor,” says one college administrator). Well, combined with a buck, the top seeding won’t get you much more than a share of Citibank stock.

Generally, the selection committee tries to minimize travel for all teams, with priority given to higher-seeded teams. Yet no team is allowed to play on a “home court,” which means any arena where the team has played four times during the regular season.

Thus, should Pitt land the East’s top seed, it’ll play the opening two rounds at the Wachovia Center in Philadelphia, offering Panther fans a simple journey to the site. Same for Tar Heel fans should UNC be dubbed No. 1 in the South region, with its first games at Greensboro.

But, heck, Pitt and UNC should beat whomever they play in those opening rounds – teams seeded 16th and, at best, 9th – even if they had to play them in the other teams’ jock dorms.

That’s one reason the tournament is known for its stirring upsets. The lack of a home-court edge buoys teams that look overmatched and underwhelming on paper.

Thus, the madness.

Once teams reach the regionals, then any geographic edge is all but a non-factor. And in Detroit, site of the Final Four, none of the potential top teams has an edge.

In others sports “seedings” are typically earned (based on record) and meaningful because it awards a team the home court/field edge, which can be the difference-maker in a deciding game.

In the NCAA tournament, the verbal sparring over the top seeds is little more than simply maddening.


Sports Needs an Economic Attitude Adjustment

March 6, 2009
Great coach. But maybe a bit out of touch.

Great coach. But maybe a bit out of touch.

It’s getting ugly out there.

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell says he’ll slash his pay package by as much as 25 percent in order to save a few jobs. However, he can’t save them all. Anonymous team employees throughout sports are being sliced with the same sickle that has eliminated millions of jobs across America since last fall. NBA owners are divvying up $200 million in loans to cover millions in shortfalls due to diminishing ticket buyers and vanishing sponsors.

Every sport, maybe for the first time ever, is feeling the same economic pinch as the fans.

Pretty soon, NASCAR teams may consider carpooling.

And yet: Albert Haynesworth gets $100 million from Washington Redskins owner Dan Snyder, Manny Ramirez snub $45 million like it’s s stick insult before coming to his senses this week – and Jim Calhoun (pictured) just doesn’t get it.

Ugly.

The relationship between sports and fans has long been tenuous – not coincidentally, as salaries have risen to Wall Street CEOesque levels. That’s especially true among fans of a generation when their own paychecks carried pretty much the same digits as the men (and, yes, they were mostly men then, too) they cheered. Superstars always made superstar money, but there was a time when the working-stiff jock actually made near working-stiff wages.

So did most coaches – guys who chose the profession for the love of their sport more than the love of money.

Not anymore. Sports has created a new, young class of fast-twitch millionaires: guys who won the gene pool lottery and, in most instances, applied diligence, discipline and plain old hard work to their physical gifts and reached the highest level of their sport. And on the sidelines, pro coaches can afford to live next door to their superstars. In college, many make more than all but their elite players ever will.

I don’t begrudge any of them. I’ve always chuckled at the petty grumblings of folks who rail against them for one sin (”They’re not as good as their predecessors.”) or another (”They don’t hustle.”) when what they really mean is: They make too much damn money.

I typically chalk up their rants to ignorance and jealousy, and move on.

But now it could get uglier than a few rants. As more Americans are stripped of their livelihoods each day, sports is being given less of a pass.

Calhoun was asked at a postgame press conference to comment on his $1.6 million annual base salary at UConn, which makes him one of the highest-paid state employees at a time when Connecticut is facing a reported $944 million budget deficit that is projected to be $8 billion in two years.

His snippy response – “My advice to you is, shut up,” followed by a rift on how much money the Huskies generate for the university – has been polarizing. Governor M. Jodi Rell called it “embarrassing,” and the leaders of the state’s General Assembly want Calhoun to be reprimanded by the university. Conversely, many have defended the coach’s reaction, saying his success through the years more than justifies his compensation – even in these trying times.

Calhoun could have been more mature in his response, even if he has the data to back his argument. As it stands, he’s come off as the newest poster boy for the excesses of sports and showed how out of touch he is with Joe Taxpayer.

And it’s more than an isolated tempest. Attendance will likely be unaffected in Storrs, but loyal ticket-buyers elsewhere are deciding they can no longer afford to see their favorite team live or buy that $100 jersey; or they simply no longer have the desire to go see athletes and coaches who don’t seem to feel their pain.

As they grow weary of the kind of “not-my-economic problem” attitude displayed by Calhoun, Ramirez and others, sports may lose its status as The Great Escape. More fans may no longer see sports as a respite from the woes of their lives.

If sports can no longer serve that purpose, then what’s its purpose?

That’s a question no one wants to answer.

Reuters photograph


This is Why Black College Football Coaches are Rare

December 15, 2008

Hamilton and Kiffin - "Blood" Brothers?

Hamilton and Kiffin - "Blood" Brothers?

“During our process, Lane Kiffin stood out. He has great football bloodlines and has been part of a strong football tradition since birth.”

Tennessee athletic director Mike Hamilton, on the hiring of the Vols’ new football coach.

This is what’s wrong with college football. What’s wrong is people such as Mike Hamilton being allowed to make major hiring decisions based on, what, genealogy? What’s even worse is that the University of Tennessee athletic director is allowed to trumpet it publicly without anyone standing up and saying: Are you freakin’ kidding?

After what Hamilton jokingly called a “national search,” one that took place in less time than it took fired Vols coach Phillip Fulmer to clean out his desk, Hamilton hired a guy with a year and a cup of coffee’s experience as a head coach and a 5-15 record, a guy who has never been a head coach at the collegiate level, never mind at a program with national championship aspirations such as Tennessee.

And he stood out because of bloodlines – the luck of the gene pool?

If we chose our president the way Hamilton hires football coaches, well, never mind. I guess we used to, but he’ll be leaving office Jan. 20.

Trouble is, Hamilton’s not alone.

That mentality, that “process”, still dominates the hiring of college football coaches, not just in the South but throughout the nation. That’s just one of the reasons why the dearth of African-American college football coaches might be the most mind-numbing story in sports. It’s been a story for as long as I can remember and the lack of progress – particularly now – might make it the most embarrassing corner of the sports landscape.

Lately, in the wake of the ouster of two black head coaches (Ty Willingham at Washington and Ron Prince at Kansas State, and the resignation of Mississippi State’s Sylvester Croom (a good coach who never really had a chance for sustainable success at MSU), the numbers have been widely reported: Just four black head football coaches among the 119 NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision schools, half as many as there were a decade ago and the fewest in 15 years.

Change? Hope?

Not in college football.

Not unless something drastic happens, on many fronts.

NCAA president Myles Brand has in the past decried the lack of black coaches. But when The Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport (TIDES) at the University of Central Florida released its annual report last month detailing the number of minorities in leadership positions in college sports, it was Charlotte Westerhaus, the NCAA’s vice president for diversity and inclusion, who told the Los Angeles Times that the numbers were “appalling.”

Brand has said the NCAA can not legislate something like the NFL’s Rooney Rule, which requires teams to interview non-white candidates for coaching vacancies. I’ve heard from all corners that it would be difficult to implement and enforce such a rule due to the autonomy of the disparate major institutions. But since when does difficult preclude trying? Form a committee comprising college presidents, advisers from pro sports and people such as Floyd Keith, executive director of the Black Coaches Association; and Richard Lapchik of Central Florida’s Institute for Diversity and Ethics in Sport and charge them with creating a framework that would be the starting point for college sports’ version of such a rule.

Then give the rule teeth with sanctions such as the loss of scholarships for schools that do not comply.

Moreover, once a hire is made, new coaches such as Kiffin should be required to adhere to the rule as well.  So far, with the hiring of his brother-in-law in some capacity and the rumored hiring of his dad as defensive coordinator, Kiffin looks to be watering the entire family tree from the Vols’ trough. Forget nepotism, but is Kiffin assembling the best staff possible?

Not possible when you’re only fishing in the family pond.

Little will change until the young black men who represent the 55 percent of all student athletes begin to hold the schools and coaches accountable for their hiring practices. Particularly those who are the cream of the recruits, the young studs who will carry the burden of expectations.

In the age of Obama, these young men should be inspired to ask the tough questions, “Why should I play for you if you don’t feel anyone like me is capable of being a leader at your institution?”

I know it’s a lot to ask of young men, but if they know their history, they know that the movement that paved the way for Obama’s election was carried out by young men and women no older than they are.

In his Pro Football Hall of Fame induction speech former NFL tight end Kellen Winslow charged a generation of recruits to leverage their opportunity to influence change: “‘Son,’” he said at one point, speaking as if he was a college coach recruiting a top player, “‘we’d really like for you to play for State U. We have a fine academic program, and a winning tradition, and it’s close to home, so your folks can see you play a lot.’ — Player to coach — “‘That sounds great, but it bothers me that there are only two African-American coaches on your staff, and neither one of them is the offensive or defensive coordinator.’”

“With these few words, African-American athletes can begin to open doors of opportunities that for whatever reason were once closed to African-Americans.”

Kiffin wasted no time to reaching out to Tennesee’s top prospect, Marlon Brown (pictured), a 6-foot-5 wide receiver from Memphis. We don’t know whether Brown asked Kiffin about his plans for his staff, whether any non-white men would be recruited as a coordinator or position coach. But we can hope.

We can hope that, at minimum, Brown will tell Kiffin to appreciate him for more than his bloodlines.

Harding Academy photo


The Rankings are Rank

November 12, 2007

Photo

Worthless. That’s what I think of preseason polls.

Oh, I know they’re fun for fans and they invoke a heavy dose of chest puffing among players. But they don’t mean squat. And if you don’t know that by now, well, you’ve been in a coma since early fall when Appalachian State thumped then No. 5 Michigan in Ann Arbor to ignite the most curious ( and entertaining, may I please add) college football season perhaps the in the history of the sport.

Now a conference no one outside of the players blood relatives has even heard on – the Atlantic Sun (doesn’t that sound like a casino? – has transformed the college basketball preseason polls into filthy rags. Gardner Webb and Mercer, the Bulldogs and Bears, lack-of-respectively, embarrassed some guys wearing big-time unis last week and rendered their vanquished to the ranks of the unranked. Kentucky and USC, Nos 22 and 18 in early polls, will probably climb back into the rankings before long – although one could argue that they’re right where they belong right now: out of the top 20 and starting at a long season of attempted redemption.

If you look at college footballs’ preseason rankings and four teams that were in the top ten -No. 1 USC, Texas, Michigan and Louisville – are ghosts (at worst) or understudies (at best) in the current rankings. Quite simply, none of them were nearly as good as their preseason hype. And since then teams that were nowhere to be found in the top 20 – No. 2 Oregon, undefeated Kansas, Missouri, Clemson, South Florida, Illinois, Kentucky, UConn (who knew they played football there?!) – have made 2007 a season to remember.

College basketball’s prognosticators obviously learned nothing. The preseason rankings are filled with unis – name schools whose biggest strength lies in the letters across the players chests. Nary a surprise among them. Neither Gardner Webb nor Mercer cracked the Top 25, and perhaps they shouldn’t. In college hoops, at least, those wins will count for something in March, should the two teams continue to play well and notch perhaps another couple of quality wins and do well in AS (Atlantic Sun). That’s when the venerable suits comprising the NCAA basketball committee locks itself in a room with a ton of very expensive shrimp and decides which teams receive invitations to the not-so-elite field of  65 teams that will have the opportunity to compete for the national title.

USC and Kentucky are the kinds of teams that typically qualify just by showing up for every regular season game with clean unis.  Not so GWebb and Mercer. But they’ve already opened some eyes.

The problem with the college football preseason poll is that it provides teams with an unfair advantage given the few spots in prestigious – read: phat payoff – postseason bowls. It’s like spotting the New England Patriots a touchdown every Sunday. Most seasons, those early notches prevent less-prominent teams with great records from breaking into the bowls of golf. This season is an aberration (though I hope not). LSU v Oregon (or even Kansas) in the title game will be refreshing.

Kill the preseason polls and allow the season to exist at least for a few weeks before releasing the first rankings. At least, by then, they won’t simply rank.

The image “http://sportsevents.net/ncaa/basketball/images/mercer_bears.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.


Andre the Giant

October 13, 2007

Photo

Okay, this is officially the best college football season ever. At this point, the national champion is almost moot. We could be looking at Kansas State v South Florida for the title and, well, it will be alright.

Today, on a Saturday with few games of an real national interest, Kentucky QB Andre Woodson – this year’s Vince Young, and my favorite player this season – orchestrated another stunning upset my leading the once woebegon-Wildcats to a 43-37 victory over No. 1 LSU. The win snapped LSU’s 13-game win streak and further threw the national title race into Twilight Zone.

Woodson (are the Jets watching???) hit Steve Jackson for a 7-yard TD to take a six-point lead in the third OT. Then after the Wildcats failed on the two-point conversion (required starting with the 3OT), vaunted LSU could not get 10 yards in four downs and were done.

Woodson was 21-for38 with 249 yards and 3 TDs. He was poised and powerful His arm zipped passes into places Chad Pennington couldn’t reach on ‘roids.

Kentucky is one of many Cinderellas in this Grimm’s of a season – the best college football season ever.

Photo


Alright Now!!

October 6, 2007

Photo

Okay, the 2007 college football season is officially in the Twilight Zone. Tonight, Stanford, my alma mater and a school whose football team likely possesses the most lopsided ratio of brains to football skills of any team on the planet, beat arch rival and No. 2 (or No. 1) ranked USC 24-23 at the Los Angeles Coliseum.

The victory snapped the Trojans’ 35-game winning streak at home, dating back to 2001 when, yes, the Cardinal last beat the Trojans. Stanford was a 40-point underdog. Yeah, forty. ( Unbelievable.

Photo

There were myriad subplots to this name – not the least of which was the bit of trash-talking by Stanford rookie coach Jim Harbaugh, which began almost before the new Cardinal coach had gotten a key to his new office. He told reporters he’d herd that USC coach Pete Carroll would leave following the 2007 season. (Carroll denied it saying Harbaugh had not checked with him about career moves.” ) Then at media day, Harbaugh said with a sarcastic tone: “There is no question in my mind that USC is the best team in the country and may be the best team in the history of college football.”

Harbaugh didn’t back down from his comments in the days leading up to the contest that was to be no-contest. But in a sly twist he also said: “We bow to no man. We bow to no program here at Stanford University.”

Coach arm-wrestling makes for good copy. But this is real: The Cardinal’s starting QB was out of the game after suffering a seizure last Sunday while watching former teammate – and now Buffalo Bills rookie QB p- Trent Edwards beat the New York Jets. (I am not making this up.) That left starting duties to sophomore Tavita Pritchard. The last time Pritchard started a game he was in high-school. In college, he’d thrown a total of four passes.

PhotoPritchard

Tonight, his numbers (11-for-30, 147 yards, 1 TD, 1 INT) weren’t particularly impressive. But this was: Trailing 23-16, the Cardinal had fourth and-ten on the USC 10-yard-line with :50 left. Pritchard had just throw two successive incomplete passes and. At the snap he back-peddled to avoid a USC assault, lofted the ball towards the left corner of the end zone and hit WR Mark Bradford (whose father passed away last week) for the game-winner. Add the extra point, and you had the biggest upset in Pac-10 football history. Some even called it the biggest upset in college football history. Unbelievable.

PhotoMark Bradford

Lest you wonder whether Pritchard was just an out-of-nowhere wonder, consider this: His uncle, and the man who tutored him as a child for hours at a time? Jack (“The Throwin’ Samoan”) Thompson, the former All-America QB at Washington State. Ya gotta love it, especially during this wacky season

The only downside of this is that if Florida upsets LSU tonight, Cal could be No. 1. Ugh.

Photo The image “http://media.scout.com/media/image/24/244845.jpg” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors. Nephew Tavita (top) and Uncle Jack


Rutgers’ Nutty (and Racist) Professor

September 28, 2007

The image “http://www.eden.rutgers.edu/~cheema/Rutgers-Football.gif” cannot be displayed, because it contains errors.

Enough with the Bill O’Reilly-Sylvia’s flap! Who cares what he thinks about a) anything – even when he is trying to be complimentary about us; and b) a restaurant?! A restaurant where even the owners weren’t all that put out by what O’Reilly said. Why should they be? They received millions in free pub over the last week.

The FOX Talk-show host’s comments do not have one iota of an impact on me, you or anyone else in America. However, the blatantly racist remarks made by a Rutgers professor this week not only besmirch the image of a university on the rise but are a slap in the face of every non-white athlete at the school. In an article published in the New York Times, English professor William Dowling, one of those nutty professors who believes the rise of athletics at a university automatically  means the decline of intellectual elitism and, well, the fall of civilization as they want it to be, said: “If you were giving the scholarship to an intellectually brilliant kid who happens to play a sport, that’s fine. But they give it to a functional illiterate who can’t read a cereal box and then make him spend 50 hours a week on physical skills. That’s not opportunity”

Now, here’s where it gets good: “If you want to give financial help to minorities, go find the ones who are at the library after school.”

This is someone who is responsible for educating our youth? God help us – or more specifically, our youth.

Not only are Dowling’s comments racist, they’re stupid and WRONG. In May, the NCAA Academic Progress Rate report, a calculation of graduation rates at institutions, ranked the Rutgers football program seventh in the nation among Division I-A schools. Ahead of them were only Stanford (Go Cardinal! Sorry, alum-bug pinched me), Navy, Duke, Rice, Boston College and Air Force.

It doesn’t quite sound like the young men who have elevated the Scarlet Knights to national prominence over the last two seasons are having any trouble reading their cereal boxes.

It took long enough for someone to speak out about this madness. On Thursday, Rutgers president Richard McCormick (Has this guy had a YEAR or what?!) called the comments “inaccurate and inhumane.” In a statement issued by the university, McCormick acknowledged the racist tone of the comment. “It also has a racist implication that has no place whatsoever in our civil discourse,” he said.

Like O’Reilly, Dowling said his comments were taken out of context. (I agree with O’Reilly, frankly; but Dowling is delusional) He said he was merely answering a question related to minorities. he said: “If someone has a way to answer that question without mentioning race, I would like to hear it.”

No word yet on whether Dowling will be allowed to continue infecting, uh, teaching young minds.

In the 1960s, was actually arrested protesting in support of the civil-rights movement. Sorry, professors, your freedom fighter cared has been revoked.


App State: “We’re No. 18!”

September 7, 2007

Photo

So there is life at the Associated Press. The venerable newswire actually made news last night by announcing that any college football team in the nation was eligible for ranking in its 71-year-old poll. Duh. Isn’t it supposed to be the top 25 college teams in the nation?

Well, at least now it is. The move was spurred, of course, by Appalachian State, who represented U’dogs everywhere with its inspiring victory over Michigan last Saturday in what was the biggest upset in college football history. (If ya’ll have a better one, holla.)

App State is a Division I-AA school (I refused to get into the new Subprime, or Subdivision terminology), a notch below Division I-A where all the college football behemoths reside – or so it’s supposed to go. Division I-AA programs are supposed to comprise the dregs of the college football crop, players who either didn’t fit the Division I-A mold (i.e. they were smaller or slower than the Div. I-A box) or couldn’t make the grades that would allow them to be eligible for the top schools.

Well, the differentiation gap has shrunk in recent years as Division I-AA programs began to attract better coaches and upgrade facilities. They began attracting better local athletes, too, guys who’ve come to know that in this digital age talent will be found no matter where it matriculates.

The kids from Boone, NC arrived in Ann Arbor believing they belonged on the same field as the boys in maze and blue, believing that they were the right team at the right time.

Then they went out and proved it.

Now, as I stated on SNY’s “Daily News Live” on Wednesday, they indeed belong in the rankings, too.

Here’s RSJ’s Today College Football Top 25:

1. LSU

2. Florida

3. USC

4. OU

5. West Virginia

6. Wisconsin

7. Texas

8. Cal

9. Ohio State

10. Georgia

11. UCLA

12. Auburn

13. Penn State

14. Rutgers

15. Georgia Tech

16. Arkansas

17. Boise State

18. Appalachian State

19. Virginia Tech

20. Nebraska

21. TCU

22. Hawaii

23. Texas A&M

24. Boston College

25. Cincinnati


Gators!!! 2006(7?) National Champs. Chris Leak Silences Losers

January 9, 2007

chris leak - university of florida

College Football’s Most Deserving Champion

I soooo hate being right. Whew. Okay. Got that out of my system. Now: Good for Chris Leak. Great for Chris Leak. This kid did all the right things – even in the midst of some stupid Gators fans – and was rewarded for it. After Florida’s 41-14 stomping of a lethargic and out-everythinged Ohio State team, Leak (25-for-36, 212 yards, 1TD) should be celebrated throughout college football. Earlier this season he was booed in his own stadium. Some losers were calling for Tim Tebow. This was Leak’s 37th career start as a Gator, With this win, He’s 35-12.

Chris, take your national championship and your MVP and tell those losers to kiss your Gator tail. They’ll be longing for you in due time.

So, who’s college football’s top 12? Here’s mine (tell me yours):

1. Florida

2. USC

3. LSU

4. Boise State

5. Oklahoma

6. Louisville

7. Wisconsin

8. Ohio State

9. Auburn

10. Michigan

11. West Virginia

12. Rutgers

PS: Dear College Presidents: This system is stupid. No national title game should be played so longer after the regualr season. Just create a national playoff and quit being, well, stupid.

  • Gamer: Chris Leak
  • Scoundrel: Jim Tressel

College Football’s “Doug Williams Moment?”

December 2, 2006

uclaftbl

ABC blew it. Following the biggest upset of the college football season – UCLA’s 13-9 defeat of #2 USC – the network first interviewed the losing head coach (Celebrity/Coach Pete Carroll), then seemingly could not get a close-up camera to UCLA coach Karl Dorrell. ABC sideline reporter Lisa Salters interviewed Dorrell but we barely saw him. He was shown from a couple of distant camera views but never the kind of close-up Carroll got.

My wife, who knows more about TV than I do, told me not to make anything big of the mis-step, saying the upset was so stunning the network just may have had its cameras in the wrong place. But the Conspiracy Guy in me still wondered: What’s up with that???

Dorrell was 6-5 going into the game, and on the proverbial hot seat. Not only did he save his own job. But just maybe he orchestrated college football’s “Doug Williams moment.” Williams’s courageous and dominating performance in leading Washington’s triumph in Super Bowl XXII forever erased any doubts about the ability of black QBs to win on pro football’s grandest stage. Now, with so many openings in college football and so few non-white head coaches – just 5 of 119 – maybe the fourth-year UCLA coach showed that non-white men can coach this game, too, and win when it matters most.

One man whose phone should definitely ring this week: UCLA defensive coordinator DeWayne Walker , who coached under Carroll with the New England Patriots and at USC. His plan was brilliantly conceived and executed. (Props to Carroll for giving Walker credit on national TV.) USC scored 66 points on the Bruins alst seasomn. But this time around, UCLA stymied the Trojans at every turn. USC was held to a paltry 55 yards rushing and failed to score at least 20 points for the first time since the 2001 Las Vegas Bowl. That a 63-game string snapped.

If Walker isn’t snapped up soon, there should be an investigation.

Are you guys listening in Miami, Alabama and elsewhere – like my alma mater, Stanford! – there are openings?

Gamer: Karl Dorrell.

http://boifromtroy.com/archives/karl%20dorrell%20cooling%20off.jpg